Written by Super User. Posted in Papers - English
INVISIBLE OR PROTAGONISTS? THE STRUGGLE TO INCLUDE FEMALE SUBJECTS IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY ANDEAN VISUAL NARRATIVES
¿INVISIBILIZADAS O PROTAGONISTAS? LAS LUCHAS POR LA INCLUSIÓN DE LOS SUJETOS FEMENINOS EN LOS RELATOS VISUALES ANDINOS DEL SIGLO XVI
José Luis Martínez C., Álvaro Durán, Daniela Sepúlveda y Andrés Mendoza
From the European invasion of the Andes in 1532 and the establishment of colonial society, there was an intense struggle over memories: between the memories collected and rewritten by Europeans and those that the Andean populations sought to preserve. In the former, androcentric bias rendered women and the spaces they had occupied in pre-Hispanic Andean societies invisible. The latter, on the other hand, struggled to construct narratives that restored the protagonism women had once held. This was possible because Andean men and women managed to retain a certain degree of enunciative autonomy, despite colonial restraints, and because they used their own recording systems, such as the qeros, to inscribe their own stories and memories, thereby escaping colonial control. From a sample of 37 sixteenth-century qeros we were able to rescue visual narratives depicting female subjects, sometimes alone or sometimes accompanied by male figures. We identified three new sets of visual signifiers corresponding to colonial-era Andean memories in which female subjects play a significant role. Drawing on colonial lexicons, we propose that the enunciative category of Andean memories was the concept of runa, which referred equally to men or women, and women and men, and that it was Spanish chroniclers and authorities who masculinized the term, thereby rendering the female subjects invisible or erasing them entirely from these narratives chroniclers and authorities who masculinized the term, making the female subjects invisible or erasing them from these accounts.
Print
Email
Written by Super User. Posted in Papers - English
FROM MULATTO GIL TO ZAMBO PELUCA: TWO CASES OF SOCIAL MOBILITY, VISIBILITY, AND REPRESENTATION OF AFRO-DESCENDANT IN CHILE IN THE 19TH CENTURY
DEL MULATO GIL AL ZAMBO PELUCA: DOS CASOS DE ASCENSO SOCIAL, VISIBILIZACIÓN E IMAGEN DEL AFRODESCENDIENTE EN CHILE EN EL SIGLO XIX
Patricia Herrera Styles
José Gil de Castro (1784-1841), nicknamed “El Mulato Gil”, and José Romero (1794-1858), known as “Zambo Peluca”, are two prominent afro-descendant figures in 19th-century Chilean history, whose lives and visual representation invite reflection on the foundations upon which the nation was built. Both were sons of enslaved mothers—one a painter born in the Viceroyalty of Peru, and the other a soldier born in the Captaincy General of Chile—and each embodies and exceptional testimony that makes it possible to discuss not only the construction of the republican order but also its racial discourse and imaginaries. Members of the Battalion of Infantes de la Patria, both men developed noteworthy trajectories that reveal the processes of recognition and invisibility experienced by people of African descent in Chile. Based on a comparative approach, this study emphasizes the visual dimension, highlighting the paradox that Gil de Castro—creator of the most iconic portraits of the nation’s founding figures—became known as the “faceless portraitist” as he left not a single image of himself; whereas Romero stands as the only Afro-descendant honored with multiple portraits. This contrast reveals the complex relationship between image and power during an era in which only a privileged few were granted “the right” to visual representation.
Print
Email